logologo
  • How it works
  • Why It Matters
  • Statistics
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
  • API
logologo
  • How it works
  • Why It Matters
  • Statistics
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
  • API
HTPBE?

Structural PDF tamper detection API. Catches edits your KYC stack misses.

Product

  • How It Works
  • Why It Matters
  • Use Cases
  • Pricing

Developers

  • API Reference
  • GitHub/docs
  • Changelogv2.34.4

Resources

  • About
  • Blog
  • Comparisons
  • Legal & Imprint

© 2024–2026 TMI Iurii Rogulia · VAT ID: FI29845875 · Made in Finland 🇫🇮

Status

Algorithm v2.34.4

Tool profile

GPL Ghostscript

GPL Ghostscript appears on both legitimate first-generation output and downstream re-save flows — context (the other tool on the same document) is what flips the signal.

Back to all statistics
Forensic verdict

Mixed signal

Based on this tool’s share of the HTPBE? corpus.

Modification rate
42%-6pp below baseline
Corpus baseline: 48%
Corpus share
0.17%
Share of all analyzed appearances
Modification rate
42%
-6pp below baseline
Role split
0%C/100%P
Creator vs Producer share of appearances

Corpus profile

How GPL Ghostscript shows up in HTPBE? corpus

Ghostscript is an open-source PostScript/PDF interpreter used both as an internal print-pipeline component (legitimate) and as a re-distillation step that flattens / rebuilds an existing PDF.

Ghostscript as the latest Producer on a document whose Creator was institutional typically indicates a re-distillation pass — that producer/creator mismatch is the contextual signal.

The signal
Ghostscript as the latest Producer on a document whose Creator was institutional typically indicates a re-distillation pass — that producer/creator mismatch is the contextual signal.

Role in the workflow

How GPL Ghostscript shows up in metadata

Every PDF carries a Creator (the application that produced the original document) and a Producer (the engine that wrote the PDF). The same tool can appear in either slot, with very different modification profiles.

CAs Creator · 0%
As Producer · 100%P
CAs Creator
  • Share of appearances
    0%
  • Modification rate
    0%
PAs Producer
  • Share of appearances
    100%
  • Modification rate
    42%
  • Avg file size
    189 KB

How to read this

The Creator slot typically reflects where a document started life. The Producer slot reflects whatever wrote the bytes — and is the field that gets overwritten when a PDF is opened, edited, and saved by a downstream tool.

A higher modification rate as Producer than as Creator usually means the tool is acting as a re-saver on documents that originated elsewhere. A higher rate as Creator points to fragile workflows around the original authoring app.

Name fingerprints

Also goes by

Different version strings and spellings observed for GPL Ghostscript in the wild. All are merged into the same canonical profile.

GPL Ghostscript 9.0613.2%
GPL Ghostscript 10.05.113.2%
GPL Ghostscript 10.07.010.5%
GPL Ghostscript 10.03.110.5%
GPL Ghostscript 10.00.07.9%
GPL Ghostscript 9.54.07.9%
GPL Ghostscript 9.55.05.3%
GPL Ghostscript 10.02.05.3%
GPL Ghostscript GIT PRERELEASE 10.05.05.3%
GPL Ghostscript 9.255.3%
GPL Ghostscript 9.53.32.6%
GPL Ghostscript 9.232.6%
GPL Ghostscript 10.06.02.6%
GPL Ghostscript 8.712.6%
GPL Ghostscript 8.702.6%
dvips + GPL Ghostscript 8.702.6%

Why variants matter

The same tool publishes itself under 16 different metadata strings — version bumps, locale tags, build IDs. We canonicalize them so the corpus reflects one identity, not noise.

Most common
GPL Ghostscript 9.06
13.2% of appearances
Variant spread
16 distinct strings
Long-tail share: 86.8%
Observed range
05.09.2022 → 06.07.2026

Distributions

What ships alongside GPL Ghostscript

The PDF versions GPL Ghostscript writes when acting as Producer, and the other tools that appear in the same documents.

PDF versions written

Most output is PDF 1.7 (50% of files where GPL Ghostscript is the Producer).

PDF 1.750.0%
PDF 1.442.9%
PDF 1.67.1%

Common Creators when GPL Ghostscript is the Producer

PScript5 sits upstream in 24% of cases — read this row as “what kinds of documents end up routed through GPL Ghostscript.”

PScript524.1%
UnknownApplication17.2%
PDFCreator13.8%
GNU Enscript10.3%
Safari6.9%
PDF246.9%
wkhtmltopdf6.9%
Microsoft Word6.9%
Crystal Reports3.4%
AFP2web SDK3.4%

Related profiles

Tools you’ll see next to GPL Ghostscript

Other tools that frequently share metadata with GPL Ghostscript in the same documents. Each card links to its own forensic profile.

C18% co-occurrence
PScript5
Corpus share1.3%
Mod rate52%
C13% co-occurrence
UnknownApplication
Corpus share0.03%
Mod rate29%
C11% co-occurrence
PDFCreator
Corpus share0.02%
Mod rate100%
C8% co-occurrence
GNU Enscript
Corpus share0.01%
Mod rate100%
C5% co-occurrence
Safari
Corpus share0.03%
Mod rate43%

Long tail

Notable observations

Smaller cuts of the GPL Ghostscript corpus — useful context, but treat each row as a single data point rather than a strong signal.

Avg pages per document
1.6
Oldest observed
05.09.2022 — almost 4 years ago

Secure your workflow

Create your account — API key on signup, free test environment on every plan.
From $15/mo. No sales call. Cancel any time.

Start Free — Close the Structural Fraud GapSee Pricing
Read API Docs →