logologo
  • How it works
  • Why It Matters
  • Statistics
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
  • API
logologo
  • How it works
  • Why It Matters
  • Statistics
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
  • API
HTPBE?

Structural PDF tamper detection API. Catches edits your KYC stack misses.

Product

  • How It Works
  • Use Cases
  • Metadata Viewer
  • Pricing

Developers

  • API Reference
  • GitHub/docs
  • Changelogv2.44.5

Resources

  • About
  • Blog
  • Comparisons
  • Legal & Imprint

© 2024–2026 TMI Iurii Rogulia · VAT ID: FI29845875 · Made in Finland 🇫🇮

Status

Algorithm v2.44.5

Tool profile

PDFlib

PDFlib appears on both legitimate first-generation output and downstream re-save flows — context (the other tool on the same document) is what flips the signal.

Back to all statistics
Forensic verdict

Mixed signal

Based on this tool’s share of the HTPBE? corpus.

Modification rate
13%-36pp below baseline
Corpus baseline: 49%
Corpus share
1.3%
Share of all analyzed appearances
Modification rate
13%
-36pp below baseline
Role split
0%C/100%P
Creator vs Producer share of appearances

Corpus profile

How PDFlib shows up in HTPBE? corpus

PDFlib is a commercial cross-platform PDF generation library used both in legitimate server-side document pipelines and for programmatic PDF assembly.

PDFlib is legitimate inside enterprise pipelines. Contextual signal: producer/creator mismatch when it is the latest Producer on a document whose Creator pointed to a different institutional source.

The signal
PDFlib is legitimate inside enterprise pipelines.

Role in the workflow

How PDFlib shows up in metadata

Every PDF carries a Creator (the application that produced the original document) and a Producer (the engine that wrote the PDF). The same tool can appear in either slot, with very different modification profiles.

CAs Creator · 0%
As Producer · 100%P
CAs Creator
  • Share of appearances
    0%
  • Modification rate
    100%
  • Avg file size
    102 KB
PAs Producer
  • Share of appearances
    100%
  • Modification rate
    13%
  • Avg file size
    998 KB

How to read this

The Creator slot typically reflects where a document started life. The Producer slot reflects whatever wrote the bytes — and is the field that gets overwritten when a PDF is opened, edited, and saved by a downstream tool.

A higher modification rate as Producer than as Creator usually means the tool is acting as a re-saver on documents that originated elsewhere. A higher rate as Creator points to fragile workflows around the original authoring app.

Name fingerprints

Also goes by

Different version strings and spellings observed for PDFlib in the wild. All are merged into the same canonical profile.

PDFlib+PDI 9.2.0 (C++/Win64)40.3%
PDFlib Personalization Server 9.0.3 (.NET/Win32)35.3%
PDFlib+PDI 8.0.2p1 (Win64)11.3%
PDFlib+PDI 9.1.2p1 (x86_64-pc-none)4.7%
PDFlib 3.02a (C++/Win32)1.3%
PDFlib+PDI 10.0.1p2 (C++/Win32)0.9%
PDFlib+PDI 9.1.2p1 (Win32)0.9%
PDFlib+PDI 10.0.0p1-i (Win32)0.9%
PDFlib 8.0.2-i (Linux)0.6%
PDFlib+PDI 10.0.2 (PHP/Linux-x64)0.6%
PDFlib0.3%
PDFlib Personalization Server 9.0.5p1 (PHP5/Linux-x86_64)0.3%
PDFlib+PDI 10.0.1p3 (Win64)0.3%
PDFlib+PDI 10.0.3p2 (Java/Linux-x64)0.3%
PDFlib 8.0.5-m (zSeries z/OS)0.3%
PDFlib+PDI 10.0.1p9-m (zSeries_z/OS)0.3%
PDFlib+PDI 9.1.1p3 (Win32)0.3%
PDFlib+PDI 10.0.0p1-i (macOS (x64))0.3%
PDFlib Lite 7.0.5p3 (PHP5/Linux-x86_64)0.3%
PDFlib+PDI 9.3.0 (Win32);e-Szigno MscPDFLib (based on PDFHummus)0.3%

Why variants matter

The same tool publishes itself under 20 different metadata strings — version bumps, locale tags, build IDs. We canonicalize them so the corpus reflects one identity, not noise.

Most common
PDFlib+PDI 9.2.0 (C++/Win64)
40.3% of appearances
Variant spread
20 distinct strings
Long-tail share: 59.7%
Observed range
14.09.2017 → 15.08.2026

Distributions

What ships alongside PDFlib

The PDF versions PDFlib writes when acting as Producer, and the other tools that appear in the same documents.

PDF versions written

Most output is PDF 1.7 (52% of files where PDFlib is the Producer).

PDF 1.752.2%
PDF 1.444.3%
PDF 1.62.1%
PDF 1.31.4%

Common Creators when PDFlib is the Producer

PTC Arbortext sits upstream in 67% of cases — read this row as “what kinds of documents end up routed through PDFlib.”

PTC Arbortext66.8%
VCTransaction17.1%
FIS Global Corp. - PDFSplit7.8%
CDP Communications Inc.2.1%
Affinity2.1%
ImageCentre Statements1.6%
Hyperion SQR1.0%
PDFlib0.5%
Designer 23.0.4 Build: 1230.5%
Symcor Inc.0.5%

Related profiles

Tools you’ll see next to PDFlib

Other tools that frequently share metadata with PDFlib in the same documents. Each card links to its own forensic profile.

C40% co-occurrence
PTC Arbortext
Corpus share0.5%
Mod rate5%
C10% co-occurrence
VCTransaction
Corpus share0.14%
Mod rate65%
C5% co-occurrence
FIS Global Corp. - PDFSplit
Corpus share0.06%
Mod rate0%
C1% co-occurrence
CDP Communications Inc.
Corpus share0.02%
Mod rate20%
C1% co-occurrence
Affinity
Corpus share0.02%
Mod rate0%

Long tail

Notable observations

Smaller cuts of the PDFlib corpus — useful context, but treat each row as a single data point rather than a strong signal.

Digitally signed
<1%

Of files carry at least one digital signature

Embedded files
<1%

Of files have attachments inside

Avg pages per document
8.1
Oldest observed
14.09.2017 — almost 9 years ago

Secure your workflow

Create your account — check PDFs on the web or with an API key, both ready on signup.
From $15/mo. No sales call. Cancel any time.

Start Free — Close the Structural Fraud GapSee Pricing
Read API Docs →