logologo
  • How it works
  • Why It Matters
  • Statistics
  • Pricing
  • API
logologo
  • How it works
  • Why It Matters
  • Statistics
  • Pricing
  • API
HTPBE?

Structural PDF tamper detection API. Catches edits your KYC stack misses.

Product

  • How It Works
  • Why It Matters
  • Use Cases
  • Pricing

Developers

  • API Reference
  • GitHub/docs
  • Changelogv2.23.1

Resources

  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Comparisons
  • Legal & Imprint

© 2024–2026 TMI Iurii Rogulia · VAT ID: FI29845875 · Made in Finland 🇫🇮

Status

Algorithm v2.23.1

Tool profile

PRO HLCAPI

PRO HLCAPI appears on both legitimate first-generation output and downstream re-save flows — context (the other tool on the same document) is what flips the signal.

Back to all statistics
Forensic verdict

Mixed signal

Based on 11 appearances across the HTPBE? corpus.

Modification rate
45%-3pp below baseline
Corpus baseline: 48%
Total appearances
11
0.10% of corpus
Modification rate
45%
-3pp below baseline
Role split
100%C/0%P
Creator vs Producer share of appearances

Corpus profile

How PRO HLCAPI shows up in HTPBE? corpus

PRO HLCAPI is one of the PDF-handling tools surfaced in the HTPBE? corpus. PRO HLCAPI appears predominantly as the original Creator (100% of its occurrences) — i.e. on documents that started life inside PRO HLCAPI rather than passing through it as a downstream re-saver.

In the HTPBE? corpus the contextual signal we look for is a producer/creator mismatch: when PRO HLCAPI appears as the latest Producer on a document whose Creator was an institutional source (e.g. Adobe PDF Library, Microsoft Word, a banking back-end), the document was rebuilt or re-saved after its original creation. That mismatch is the marker — never the tool itself.

On documents where PRO HLCAPI acts as Creator, 45% carry modification markers; on documents where it acts as Producer, 0% do. These are observed rates inside the HTPBE? corpus and should be read as base-rates, not as accusations against PRO HLCAPI or its users.

The signal
In the HTPBE? corpus the contextual signal we look for is a producer/creator mismatch: when PRO HLCAPI appears as the latest Producer on a document whose Creator was an institutional source (e.g. Adobe PDF Library, Microsoft Word, a banking back-end), the document was rebuilt or re-saved after its original creation. That mismatch is the marker — never the tool itself.

Role in the workflow

How PRO HLCAPI shows up in metadata

Every PDF carries a Creator (the application that produced the original document) and a Producer (the engine that wrote the PDF). The same tool can appear in either slot, with very different modification profiles.

CAs Creator · 100%
As Producer · 0%P
CAs Creator
  • Usage
    11
  • Modification rate
    45%
  • Avg file size
    458 KB
PAs Producer
  • Usage
    0
  • Modification rate
    0%

How to read this

The Creator slot typically reflects where a document started life. The Producer slot reflects whatever wrote the bytes — and is the field that gets overwritten when a PDF is opened, edited, and saved by a downstream tool.

A higher modification rate as Producer than as Creator usually means the tool is acting as a re-saver on documents that originated elsewhere. A higher rate as Creator points to fragile workflows around the original authoring app.

Distributions

What ships alongside PRO HLCAPI

The PDF versions PRO HLCAPI writes when acting as Producer, and the other tools that appear in the same documents.

Common Producers when PRO HLCAPI is the Creator

CrawfordTech writes 45% of these files — that pairing is the Adobe-stack default for many institutional pipelines.

CrawfordTech45.5%
iOS Print to PDF18.2%
Barclays Statement Production System18.2%
Pdftools SDK9.1%

Related profiles

Tools you’ll see next to PRO HLCAPI

Other tools that frequently share metadata with PRO HLCAPI in the same documents. Each card links to its own forensic profile.

P45% co-occurrence
CrawfordTech
Appearances67
Mod rate16%
P18% co-occurrence
iOS Print to PDF
Appearances347
Mod rate68%
P18% co-occurrence
Barclays Statement Production System
Appearances2
Mod rate0%
P9% co-occurrence
Pdftools SDK
Appearances238
Mod rate95%

Long tail

Notable observations

Smaller cuts of the PRO HLCAPI corpus — useful context, but treat each row as a single data point rather than a strong signal.

Pages parsed
33
Oldest observed
25 Jun 2022 — almost 4 years ago

Secure your workflow

Create your account — API key on signup, free test environment on every plan.
From $15/mo. No sales call. Cancel any time.

Start free — close the structural fraud gapSee pricing
Read API docs →