Fake P45 Detection – Check If a P45 PDF Was Edited
A P45 sets the new starter’s tax code and pay-to-date – and an edited one cascades into payroll. New-employer HR teams trust the P45 the starter brings. Payroll uses it to set the tax code and the pay-and-tax-to-date for the year. When that P45 is fabricated or tampered, the error compounds across every payslip until HMRC eventually corrects it – and the discrepancy lands on someone’s desk.
HTPBE? analyzes the structural layer of the PDF file – the layer that records every edit, even invisible ones. We don’t inspect holograms, phone photos, or ID biometrics. If your fraud problem is a digitally altered or fabricated P45, we’re the most specific tool for it.
When HTPBE? returns INCONCLUSIVE on a P45, that is a reason to escalate to manual review, not proof of fraud – it means HTPBE? cannot confirm the file as an untouched original.
The UK context
What a P45 is – and where an edited one turns up
A P45 is the leaving statement a UK employer issues when someone stops working for them. It records the leaver’s tax code, their pay to date and tax paid to date in the current tax year, and the employer’s PAYE reference. The employer sends one part to HMRC and gives the leaver the other parts – increasingly as a PDF from the payroll software rather than on paper.
The new employer’s payroll uses the figures on that document to put the starter on the right tax code and carry their year-to-date pay and tax forward. That is why HR and onboarding teams handle P45s as routine paperwork. Letting agents, lenders and background-check providers also see them now and then when an applicant offers a P45 alongside payslips and a P60 as proof of earnings.
A starter without a P45 is normal and not a warning sign: the new employer gets a starter checklist instead. The risk is the P45 that is offered – a real one with changed figures or a tax code, or one rebuilt from scratch to cover a gap in the work history. The page can look exactly right while the file behind it says otherwise.
What a verdict does and does not tell you
- 1MODIFIED – the PDF shows signs of being changed after the payroll system produced it. Ask for a fresh copy from the previous employer.
- 2INTACT – no sign of editing after production. It does not confirm that the employer’s own figures were correct.
- 3INCONCLUSIVE – the file carries no payroll-system baseline to compare against. Treat it as a reason to confirm with the employer, not as proof of fraud.
- 4Scanned or photographed P45s are never returned as INTACT, because a scan cannot show whether the paper was altered first.
- 5HTPBE? does not read the pay or tax figures and does not query HMRC.
What this looks like
How fake and tampered P45 PDFs actually look
Three real fraud mechanics we catch at the structural PDF layer.
Pay and tax to date edited up
The new starter takes the real P45 from their previous employer’s payroll, opens it in any PDF editor or spreadsheet, edits the Total pay to date or Total tax to date, exports as PDF. The edit typically leaves traces of the editor in the file. Visual layout preserved; the file structure is not.
P45 fabricated to skip a gap of unemployment
There is a six-month gap between the real last working day and the new start date – the candidate was either out of work or working under the table. They build a P45 in Word using a template, type in plausible figures, export to PDF. However closely it copies the HMRC layout, the file does not come back INTACT: with nothing indicating later editing it returns INCONCLUSIVE and should go to manual review; with evidence of editing or fabrication, MODIFIED.
Tax code rewritten to favour the starter
A BR or D0 emergency code on the original P45 means more tax. The starter edits the code to their preferred letter (1257L, etc.) before submitting. Even when the visual layout is clean, HTPBE? flags the post-issuance edit.
The scale
Why your existing checks miss this
Payroll trusts the P45 figures. Trust them too readily and the error cascades.
HMRC eventually flags the discrepancy. By then payroll has been paying the wrong figures for months.
New-employer payroll systems take the P45 figures at face value when adding a starter – that is the design intent. HMRC catches the discrepancy through Real Time Information once the new employer files an FPS, but the lag can run weeks or months. Tampered P45s used in fraudulent loan or housing applications meanwhile pass through HR and payroll undetected. HTPBE? inspects the P45 PDF at the moment of intake, before payroll trusts the numbers – standalone, no HMRC API, no payroll-bureau lookup.
What HTPBE? checks
Detection capabilities
Deterministic structural signals. No probabilistic scores, no model training.
Rebuilt P45s aren’t waved through
A P45 saved as PDF from Word, Excel or LibreOffice does not come back INTACT, however closely it copies the HMRC layout. With no sign of later editing it returns INCONCLUSIVE for manual review; with evidence of editing or fabrication, MODIFIED.
Post-issuance edit detection
Editing a P45 after issuance – in a PDF editor, or by rebuilding it in other software – leaves structural evidence behind. HTPBE? flags it as MODIFIED.
Character overlay on the original
Changing a figure on an existing P45 leaves a structural trace. HTPBE? flags it without reading the page – it never looks at what the figures say.
Dates that disagree
A ‘freshly issued’ P45 whose own dates show it was changed months later is a high-confidence flag for post-issuance editing.
Reassembled documents
HTPBE? detects documents assembled from pages of different sources and documents reworked after their original creation.
Values overlaid on a scan
HTPBE? detects scans mixed with inserted content – values laid over a scanned page to substitute what it originally showed.
Share with engineering
Wire this into your intake pipeline in under a day
Two API calls – one POST to submit the PDF, one GET to retrieve the verdict. Forward this page to your engineering team; the full API reference, quotas, and copy-paste examples in cURL, JavaScript, Python, PHP, Go, and Ruby are one click away.
Pricing
Self-serve plans, no sales call
All plans include the same forensic checks. Pick the quota that matches your monthly document volume.
manualStarter
30 credits/mo
Manual spot-checks and integration testing
most commonGrowth
350 credits/mo
Active document processing pipelines
high volumePro
1,500 credits/mo
High-volume automation and API integrations
Enterprise (unlimited, on-premise available) — see full pricing
API key on signup. Free test environment on every plan. No card required.
Customer Stories
Teams that stopped document fraud
Compliance, finance, and risk teams use HTPBE? to catch manipulated PDFs before they become costly mistakes.
Caught an invoice where the total had been changed by less than a thousand dollars. Without this I would have approved it without a second look.
Sarah M.
AP Manager
United States
We had three applicants in the same week with bank statements that looked completely fine. Two of them were flagged as modified. You simply cannot see this by reading the document — it is in the file structure.
Lars V.
Risk Analyst, Online Lending
Netherlands
Salary slips were coming with altered figures. We identified two problematic files before the placement was finalised.
Priya K.
HR Operations Lead
India
Since we started checking documents this way, we stopped two applications early in the process that would have been very difficult to reverse later.
Julien R.
Fraud Analyst, Fintech
France
Some applicants were sending PDFs that looked authentic but had been edited in ways not visible to the eye. We now ask for checked originals when something is flagged. Already saved us from a few bad decisions.
Marta S.
Compliance Coordinator
Spain
One invoice was caught because there was a mismatch between the document dates and structure. That particular case would have cost us significantly.
Tariq A.
Finance Manager
United Arab Emirates
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Does HTPBE? work with P45s from any UK payroll provider?
What if the previous employer is small and uses Word for P45s?
inconclusive – not intact – whether a small employer made it or someone copying the HMRC layout did. Treat it as a prompt for a manual check with the employer, not as proof of fraud. The verdict is modified only when the file itself carries evidence of editing or fabrication.Can it catch P45s where only the tax code was edited?
modified, with the named markers behind it.Does the API need a reference original P45 to compare against?
What does an INCONCLUSIVE verdict mean for a P45?
What is a P45, and who asks to see one?
Does HTPBE? check the pay and tax figures against HMRC?
Can a scanned or photographed P45 come back as INTACT?
What should HR do when a P45 comes back MODIFIED?
Secure your workflow
Create your account – check PDFs on the web or with an API key, both ready on signup.
No sales call. Cancel any time.