logologo
  • How it works
  • Why It Matters
  • Statistics
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
  • API
logologo
  • How it works
  • Why It Matters
  • Statistics
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
  • API
HTPBE?

Structural PDF tamper detection API. Catches edits your KYC stack misses.

Product

  • How It Works
  • Why It Matters
  • Use Cases
  • Pricing

Developers

  • API Reference
  • GitHub/docs
  • Changelogv2.43.0

Resources

  • About
  • Blog
  • Comparisons
  • Legal & Imprint

© 2024–2026 TMI Iurii Rogulia · VAT ID: FI29845875 · Made in Finland 🇫🇮

Status

Algorithm v2.43.0

Tool profile

Microsoft Reporting Services

Microsoft Reporting Services reads as a institutional generator — its modification rate sits at or below the corpus baseline, consistent with single-pass institutional output.

Back to all statistics
Forensic verdict

Legitimate origin

Based on this tool’s share of the HTPBE? corpus.

Modification rate
45%-3pp below baseline
Corpus baseline: 48%
Corpus share
4.1%
Share of all analyzed appearances
Modification rate
45%
-3pp below baseline
Role split
63%C/37%P
Creator vs Producer share of appearances

Corpus profile

How Microsoft Reporting Services shows up in HTPBE? corpus

Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services (SSRS) is an enterprise reporting platform that emits PDFs server-side from parameterized report templates — common in healthcare, government, and large back-office workflows.

SSRS-produced PDFs are server-rendered institutional output. Low signal for tampering when SSRS is the sole Producer.

The signal
SSRS-produced PDFs are server-rendered institutional output.

Role in the workflow

How Microsoft Reporting Services shows up in metadata

Every PDF carries a Creator (the application that produced the original document) and a Producer (the engine that wrote the PDF). The same tool can appear in either slot, with very different modification profiles.

CAs Creator · 63%
As Producer · 37%P
CAs Creator
  • Share of appearances
    63%
  • Modification rate
    57%
  • Avg file size
    377 KB
PAs Producer
  • Share of appearances
    37%
  • Modification rate
    25%
  • Avg file size
    370 KB

How to read this

The Creator slot typically reflects where a document started life. The Producer slot reflects whatever wrote the bytes — and is the field that gets overwritten when a PDF is opened, edited, and saved by a downstream tool.

A higher modification rate as Producer than as Creator usually means the tool is acting as a re-saver on documents that originated elsewhere. A higher rate as Creator points to fragile workflows around the original authoring app.

Name fingerprints

Also goes by

Different version strings and spellings observed for Microsoft Reporting Services in the wild. All are merged into the same canonical profile.

Microsoft Reporting Services 2019.11.0.061.2%
Microsoft Reporting Services PDF Rendering Extension 2019.11.0.034.4%
Microsoft Reporting Services 14.0.0.00.9%
Microsoft Reporting Services 11.0.0.00.5%
Microsoft Reporting Services PDF Rendering Extension 11.0.0.00.5%
Microsoft Reporting Services PDF Rendering Extension 14.0.0.0; modified using iTextSharp™ 5.5.13.4 ©2000-2024 iText Group NV (AGPL-version)0.4%
Microsoft Reporting Services PDF Rendering Extension 14.0.0.00.4%
Microsoft Reporting Services 2022.1.0.00.2%
Microsoft Reporting Services 12.0.0.00.2%
Microsoft Reporting Services PDF Rendering Extension 12.0.0.00.2%
Microsoft Reporting Services PDF Rendering Extension 2022.1.0.00.2%
Microsoft Reporting Services 15.0.0.00.1%
Microsoft Reporting Services 13.0.0.00.1%
Microsoft Reporting Services 10.0.0.00.1%
Microsoft Reporting Services PDF Rendering Extension 15.0.0.00.1%
Microsoft Reporting Services PDF Rendering Extension 2019.11.0.0; modified using iTextSharp™ 5.5.13.3 ©2000-2022 iText Group NV (AGPL-version)0.1%
Microsoft Reporting Services PDF Rendering Extension 13.0.0.00.1%
Microsoft Reporting Services PDF Rendering Extension 10.0.0.00.1%

Why variants matter

The same tool publishes itself under 18 different metadata strings — version bumps, locale tags, build IDs. We canonicalize them so the corpus reflects one identity, not noise.

Most common
Microsoft Reporting Services 2019.11.0.0
61.2% of appearances
Variant spread
18 distinct strings
Long-tail share: 38.8%
Observed range
30.05.2019 → 30.07.2026

Distributions

What ships alongside Microsoft Reporting Services

The PDF versions Microsoft Reporting Services writes when acting as Producer, and the other tools that appear in the same documents.

PDF versions written

Most output is PDF 1.7 (95% of files where Microsoft Reporting Services is the Producer).

PDF 1.795.3%
PDF 1.34.7%

Common Creators when Microsoft Reporting Services is the Producer

Microsoft Reporting Services sits upstream in 100% of cases — read this row as “what kinds of documents end up routed through Microsoft Reporting Services.”

Microsoft Reporting Services99.7%
GOAT Logistics0.3%

Related profiles

Tools you’ll see next to Microsoft Reporting Services

Other tools that frequently share metadata with Microsoft Reporting Services in the same documents. Each card links to its own forensic profile.

C0% co-occurrence
GOAT Logistics
Corpus share0.00%
Mod rate100%

Long tail

Notable observations

Smaller cuts of the Microsoft Reporting Services corpus — useful context, but treat each row as a single data point rather than a strong signal.

Avg pages per document
2.0
Oldest observed
30.05.2019 — about 7 years ago

Secure your workflow

Create your account — API key on signup, free test environment on every plan.
From $15/mo. No sales call. Cancel any time.

Start Free — Close the Structural Fraud GapSee Pricing
Read API Docs →