logologo
  • How it works
  • Why It Matters
  • Statistics
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
  • API
logologo
  • How it works
  • Why It Matters
  • Statistics
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
  • API
HTPBE?

Structural PDF tamper detection API. Catches edits your KYC stack misses.

Product

  • How It Works
  • Use Cases
  • Metadata Viewer
  • Pricing

Developers

  • API Reference
  • GitHub/docs
  • Changelogv2.48.0

Resources

  • About
  • Blog
  • Comparisons
  • Legal & Imprint

© 2024–2026 TMI Iurii Rogulia · VAT ID: FI29845875 · Made in Finland

Status

Algorithm v2.48.0

Tool profile

Skia/PDF

Skia/PDF reads as a institutional generator — its modification rate in our corpus does not sit meaningfully above the baseline. The name alone is never the verdict; each file is judged on its own structure.

Back to all statistics
Forensic verdict

Legitimate origin

Based on this tool’s share of the HTPBE? corpus.

Modification rate
21%-28pp below baseline
Corpus baseline: 49%
Corpus share
2.3%
Share of all analyzed appearances
Modification rate
21%
-28pp below baseline
Role split
0%C/100%P
Creator vs Producer share of appearances

Corpus profile

How Skia/PDF shows up in HTPBE? corpus

Skia/PDF is the Google Skia graphics library’s PDF backend, used by Chrome, ChromeOS print, Android Print Framework, and several embedded Google products.

Skia/PDF marks a render from the Chrome and Chromium family, usually HTML turned into PDF. Its name is one input among many in HTPBE?’s analysis.

The signal
Skia/PDF marks a render from the Chrome and Chromium family, usually HTML turned into PDF.

Reading guide

How to read this page

Every PDF stores two software labels: the Creator, which names the application that first produced the document, and the Producer, which names the software that last wrote the file out. This page counts the files HTPBE? has analysed where Skia/PDF fills one of those labels, and shows how often those files carry modification markers, which PDF versions they use and which other tools sit next to them.

A tool name tells you where a file passed through, not whether anyone changed its content. A Creator and Producer that agree usually point to a single pass; a Producer that differs from the Creator means the file was written out again by another program, which has many ordinary explanations such as compression, merging or a print-to-PDF step.

Caveats

  • The figures cover 619 files. Larger than a handful, but still a sample of what was submitted, not of all PDFs in the world.
  • The statistics describe files HTPBE? analysed. They are not a judgement of the quality or trustworthiness of Skia/PDF.
  • Submitted files lean towards documents that someone wanted checked, so rates here can sit higher than in everyday document flows.
  • Metadata can be rewritten by anyone, so a producer name on its own is never treated as proof either way.
Read a PDF’s metadata for freeAll tool statisticsCreator vs Producer explainedPDF metadata fields referenceCheck PDFs through the API

Role in the workflow

How Skia/PDF shows up in metadata

Every PDF carries a Creator (the application that produced the original document) and a Producer (the engine that wrote the PDF). The same tool can appear in either slot, with very different modification profiles.

CAs Creator · 0%
As Producer · 100%P
CAs Creator
  • Share of appearances
    0%
  • Modification rate
    0%
  • Avg file size
    49 KB
PAs Producer
  • Share of appearances
    100%
  • Modification rate
    21%
  • Avg file size
    304 KB

How to read this

The Creator slot typically reflects where a document started life. The Producer slot reflects whatever wrote the final file, which is not always the same software.

A higher modification rate as Producer than as Creator usually means the tool is acting as a re-saver on documents that originated elsewhere. A higher rate as Creator points to fragile workflows around the original authoring app.

Name fingerprints

Also goes by

Different version strings and spellings observed for Skia/PDF in the wild. All are merged into the same canonical profile.

Skia/PDF m95 Google Docs Renderer19.9%
Skia/PDF m1496.8%
Skia/PDF m1464.7%
Skia/PDF m1453.7%
Skia/PDF m1523.7%
Skia/PDF m149 Google Docs Renderer3.6%
Skia/PDF m1503.2%
Skia/PDF m1473.2%
Skia/PDF m1513.2%
Skia/PDF m1533.1%
Skia/PDF m1443.1%
Skia/PDF m1233.1%
Skia/PDF m1423.1%
Skia/PDF m1332.4%
Skia/PDF m1362.3%
Skia/PDF m148 Google Docs Renderer2.1%
Skia/PDF m812.1%
Skia/PDF m1481.8%
Skia/PDF m1321.8%
Skia/PDF m1201.6%
Skia/PDF m1151.5%
Skia/PDF m1311.1%
Skia/PDF m156 Google Docs Renderer1.1%
Skia/PDF m1281.1%
Skia/PDF m1051.0%
Skia/PDF m1430.8%
Skia/PDF m1380.8%
Skia/PDF m1540.8%
Skia/PDF m1010.6%
Skia/PDF m1250.6%
Skia/PDF m760.6%
Skia/PDF m1260.6%
Skia/PDF m147 Google Docs Renderer0.6%
Skia/PDF m152 Google Docs Renderer0.6%
Skia/PDF m1120.6%
Skia/PDF m1270.5%
Skia/PDF m1550.5%
Skia/PDF m1350.5%
Skia/PDF m1370.5%
Skia/PDF m1300.5%
Skia/PDF m153 Google Docs Renderer0.5%
Skia/PDF m157 Google Docs Renderer0.3%
Skia/PDF m820.3%
Skia/PDF m150 Google Docs Renderer0.3%
Skia/PDF m1090.3%
Skia/PDF m990.3%
Skia/PDF m145 Google Docs Renderer0.3%
Skia/PDF m1290.3%
Skia/PDF m1340.3%
Skia/PDF m1140.3%
Skia/PDF m1400.2%
Skia/PDF m780.2%
Skia/PDF m158 Google Docs Renderer0.2%
Skia/PDF m144 Google Docs Renderer0.2%
Skia/PDF m116; modified using OpenPDF 2.4.00.2%
Skia/PDF m800.2%
Skia/PDF m960.2%
Skia/PDF m61; modified using iTextSharp™ 5.5.13.3 ©2000-2022 iText Group NV (Wizz Air; licensed version)0.2%
Skia/PDF m1560.2%
Skia/PDF m860.2%
Skia/PDF m94 Google Docs Renderer; modified using OpenPDF 2.0.20.2%
Skia/PDF m154 Google Docs Renderer0.2%
Skia/PDF m151 Google Docs Renderer0.2%
Skia/PDF m1240.2%
Skia/PDF m920.2%
Skia/PDF m148 Google Apps Renderer0.2%
Skia/PDF m146 Google Docs Renderer0.2%
Skia/PDF m155 Google Docs Renderer0.2%
Skia/PDF m126 Google Docs Renderer0.2%

Why variants matter

The same tool publishes itself under 69 different metadata strings – version bumps, locale tags, build IDs. We canonicalize them so the corpus reflects one identity, not noise.

Most common
Skia/PDF m95 Google Docs Renderer
19.9% of appearances
Variant spread
69 distinct strings
Long-tail share: 80.1%
Observed range
29.09.2017 → 27.10.2026

Distributions

What ships alongside Skia/PDF

The PDF versions Skia/PDF writes when acting as Producer, and the other tools that appear in the same documents.

PDF versions written

Most output is PDF 1.4 (89% of files where Skia/PDF is the Producer).

PDF 1.489.0%
PDF 1.75.8%
PDF 1.63.5%
PDF 2.00.9%
PDF 1.50.6%
PDF 1.30.2%

Common Creators when Skia/PDF is the Producer

Chrome (Print to PDF) sits upstream in 65% of cases — read this row as “what kinds of documents end up routed through Skia/PDF.”

Chrome (Print to PDF)65.0%
Headless Chrome25.5%
Edge (Print to PDF)6.6%
'UnknownApplication'1.0%
Google Chrome0.7%
Firefox0.5%
Microsoft Word0.5%
FlowCV - https://flowcv.com0.2%

Related profiles

Tools you’ll see next to Skia/PDF

Other tools that frequently share metadata with Skia/PDF in the same documents. Each card links to its own forensic profile.

C43% co-occurrence
Chrome (Print to PDF)
Corpus share1.4%
Mod rate29%
C17% co-occurrence
Headless Chrome
Corpus share0.46%
Mod rate27%
C4% co-occurrence
Edge (Print to PDF)
Corpus share0.12%
Mod rate34%
C1% co-occurrence
'UnknownApplication'
Corpus share0.01%
Mod rate50%
C0% co-occurrence
Google Chrome
Corpus share0.01%
Mod rate0%

Long tail

Notable observations

Smaller cuts of the Skia/PDF corpus – useful context, but treat each row as a single data point rather than a strong signal.

Digitally signed
<1%

Of files carry at least one digital signature

Embedded files
<1%

Of files have attachments inside

Avg pages per document
2.2
Oldest observed
29.09.2017 — about 9 years ago

FAQ

Skia/PDF in PDF metadata: common questions

What is Skia/PDF?

Skia/PDF is the Google Skia graphics library’s PDF backend, used by Chrome, ChromeOS print, Android Print Framework, and several embedded Google products.

Why does Skia/PDF appear in the metadata of a PDF?

A PDF can record the software that created it (Creator) and the software that last wrote the file out (Producer). When Skia/PDF generated the file, or re-saved it, it can leave its name in one of those fields. The field is filled in by software, not checked by anyone, so it is a hint about the file’s history rather than a guarantee.

Does Skia/PDF in the metadata mean the PDF was edited?

No. A producer name alone proves nothing about whether a document was changed. Many Skia/PDF files are original output, and a file that was edited can name any tool at all. What matters is the whole picture: how the file is built, how its dates and structure line up, and whether the Creator and Producer fit together.

How should I read the Skia/PDF statistics?

The figures describe the 619 files in the HTPBE? corpus that list Skia/PDF as Creator or Producer. The modification rate is the share of those files that carry modification markers. It is a base rate for this particular set of files, not a property of Skia/PDF and not a prediction for any single document.

Can I compare Skia/PDF with other tools using these numbers?

Only loosely. The corpus consists of PDFs people chose to submit for checking, which skews towards documents someone had a reason to doubt. A tool popular for legitimate bulk output can still show a high rate here, and a rarely seen tool can show an extreme rate from a handful of files. These pages are not a quality ranking of the tools themselves.

How do I check a PDF that lists Skia/PDF?

Upload it to HTPBE? for a modification check, or open it in the free PDF Metadata Viewer to see the Creator, Producer and dates stored in the file. The same check is available through the HTPBE? API.

Secure your workflow

Create your account – check PDFs on the web or with an API key, both ready on signup.
No sales call. Cancel any time.

Start Free – Close the Structural Fraud GapSee Pricing
Read API Docs →